WELCOME
Thursday, August 24, 2017
TPACK
Universal design for learning
provides the opportunity for all students to access, participate in and
progress in the general education curriculum by reducing barriers to
instruction. UDL is a research based Framework that helps teachers plan
learning to meet the diverse and variable needs of all students. UDL helps to
explore how hidden barriers to learning can be identified and minimized.
ORGINS
OF UDL
The UDL Framework was conceived by
researchers at the center for Applied Special Technologies (CAST) in the late
1980 as the result of three conceptual shifts:
UNIVERSAL DESIGN : After the
passage of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) in the 1990’s, the schools
and other public buildings were retrofitted with ramps and other architectural
featuresto provide physical access. These changes were an expensive
afterthought rather than proactive design. Leaders in the field of architecture
suggested a more cost -effective strategy-designing the building from the beginning
with flexible Universal Design principles in mind so that all users could have
access.
DIGITALIZED TEXT: At the same time, technological
advances allowed alternatives to “one size fits all” academic materials that
used only one fixed material -print. Now, text could be easily enlarged,
simplified, summarized, highlighted, translated, converted to speech,
graphically represented and supported through accessible, digital materials.
BRAIN RESEARCH ON LEARNING NETWORKS : Concurrently,
brain imaging conducted while individuals were engaged in learning (eg:reading,writing)
revealed three networks at work in the brain during learning :recognition
network (the “what” of learning), strategic network (the “how” of learning),
and effective network (the “why” of learning) (Rose and Meyer 2002)
Influenced by architectural
Universal design principles ,the accessibility and flexibility offered by digitized
text, and the conceptualization of three learning networks, innovators at CAST developed
what they called “Universal design For Learning”.
Three principles organize the UDL
guidelines
UDL
is based on three main principles
Representation: UDL offers
information in more than one format. For example, text books are primarily
visual.But providing text, audio, video and hands-on learning gives all kids a
chance to access the material in whichever way is best suited to their learning
strengths.
Action and expression:UDL give kids
more than one way to interact with the material and to show what they have
learned. For example, teachers can assess students using pen and paper tests,
oral presentations or group projects.
Engagement: UDL looks for different
ways to motivate students. Letting kids make choices and giving them
assignments that feel relevant to their lives are some examples of how teachers
can sustain students' interest.Other common strategies include making skill
building feel like agame and creating opportunities for students to get up and
move around the classroom.
TheUDL framework provides a
flexible, responsive curriculum that reduces or eliminate barriers to learning.UDL
approach of Curriculum options that present information and content in varied
ways, differentiate the manner in which learners can express what they know,
and encourage students in meaningful, authentic learning. With UDL, more
students are:
·
Engaged in their own education.
·
Learning in greater breadth and depth.
·
Achieving at higher levels.
·
Motivated to continue learning
Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge
(TPACK )
TPACK is an emergent form of knowledge that goes beyond all three “core” components(content,pedagogy,and technology). Expert teachers now are those who can bring together knowledge of subject matter, what is good forlearning and technology (ICT). The expert teachers needs to make creative links between what is being learned(content), how is it taught( pedagogy), and the appropriate tools (technology ). The combination is described as TechnologicalPedagogicalContentKnowledge(TPACK).
Content knowledge
Content knowledge is teachers
knowledge about the subject matter to be learnt of taught.Knowledge of content
is of critical importance for teachers. As Shulman (1986) noted ,this knowledge
would include knowledge of concepts, theories, ideas, organizational
frameworks, knowledge of evidence and proof, aswell as established practices
and approaches toward developing such knowledge. The cost of not having a
comprehensive base of content knowledge can be prohibit, for example, students
can receive incorrect information and development misconceptions about the
content area.
Pedagogical
knowledge
Pedagogical knowledge is teachers
deep knowledge about the processes and practices or methods of teaching and
learning. They encompass, among other things, overall educational purposes,
values and aims.
Pedagogical
content knowledge
PCK is the notion of the
transformation of the subject matter for teaching. This transformationoccurs as
the teacher interprets the subject matter, find multiple ways to represent it,
and adapts and tailors the instructional materials to alternative conceptions
and students’ prior knowledge.
Technology
knowledge
Technology knowledge is always in a
state of flux- more so than the other two core knowledge domains in the TPACK framework.
The definition of TK used in the TPACK Framework is close to that of fluency of
Information Technology.
Technological
pedagogical knowledge.
TPK Is an understanding of how
teaching and learning can change when particular technologies are used in particular
ways. To build TPK, a deeper understanding of the constraints and affordances
of technologies and the disciplinary contexts within which they function is
needed
Technological
content knowledge
Knowledge of how to use Technology
within a specific content area. Teachers need to understand which specific
technologies are best suited for addressing subject-matter learning in their
domains and how the content dictates or perhaps even changes the technology -or
vice versa.
·
Technological pedagogical content
knowledge(TPACK) is the knowledge base teachers need to effectively teach with
the use of technology in various subjects and practicing teaching methods.
·
TPACK makes the learning of the subject
for the student easier with appropriate pedagogy and Technology.
·
TPACK is aimed to help teachers in
creative thinking.
·
With the practice of TPACK, the process
of curriculum sample will reflect teachers' experiences to be more professional
and bringing a new dimension to technology for educational purposes.
·
The framework of TPACK model requires
that teachers should develop a detailed complex, fluent and flexible knowledge
of all the components, and teachers should find the appropriate technology and
should know how and why to use this technology in the teaching process.
·
Teachers' beliefs and experiences are
also effective in the environment of Information and Communication technologies
in education.
·
Teachers should improve themselves in
order to harmonize the existing technology with pedagogical and professional
competence, to easily overcome the possible problems, to find appropriate
solutions and develop new plans.
·
Teachers' perception of information
technologies and their views on, and practice in the use of these technologies
are important in terms of determining the present progress in technology
enhanced learning.
TPACK
Universal design for learning
provides the opportunity for all students to access, participate in and
progress in the general education curriculum by reducing barriers to
instruction. UDL is a research based Framework that helps teachers plan
learning to meet the diverse and variable needs of all students. UDL helps to
explore how hidden barriers to learning can be identified and minimized.
ORGINS
OF UDL
The UDL Framework was conceived by
researchers at the center for Applied Special Technologies (CAST) in the late
1980 as the result of three conceptual shifts:
UNIVERSAL DESIGN : After the
passage of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) in the 1990’s, the schools
and other public buildings were retrofitted with ramps and other architectural
featuresto provide physical access. These changes were an expensive
afterthought rather than proactive design. Leaders in the field of architecture
suggested a more cost -effective strategy-designing the building from the beginning
with flexible Universal Design principles in mind so that all users could have
access.
DIGITALIZED TEXT: At the same time, technological
advances allowed alternatives to “one size fits all” academic materials that
used only one fixed material -print. Now, text could be easily enlarged,
simplified, summarized, highlighted, translated, converted to speech,
graphically represented and supported through accessible, digital materials.
Influenced by architectural
Universal design principles ,the accessibility and flexibility offered by digitized
text, and the conceptualization of three learning networks, innovators at CAST developed
what they called “Universal design For Learning”.
Three principles organize the UDL
guidelines
UDL
is based on three main principles
Representation: UDL offers
information in more than one format. For example, text books are primarily
visual.But providing text, audio, video and hands-on learning gives all kids a
chance to access the material in whichever way is best suited to their learning
strengths.
Action and expression:UDL give kids
more than one way to interact with the material and to show what they have
learned. For example, teachers can assess students using pen and paper tests,
oral presentations or group projects.
Engagement: UDL looks for different
ways to motivate students. Letting kids make choices and giving them
assignments that feel relevant to their lives are some examples of how teachers
can sustain students' interest.Other common strategies include making skill
building feel like agame and creating opportunities for students to get up and
move around the classroom.
TheUDL framework provides a
flexible, responsive curriculum that reduces or eliminate barriers to learning.UDL
approach of Curriculum options that present information and content in varied
ways, differentiate the manner in which learners can express what they know,
and encourage students in meaningful, authentic learning. With UDL, more
students are:
·
Engaged in their own education.
·
Learning in greater breadth and depth.
·
Achieving at higher levels.
·
Motivated to continue learning
Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge
(TPACK )
TPACK is an emergent form of knowledge that goes beyond all three “core” components(content,pedagogy,and technology). Expert teachers now are those who can bring together knowledge of subject matter, what is good forlearning and technology (ICT). The expert teachers needs to make creative links between what is being learned(content), how is it taught( pedagogy), and the appropriate tools (technology ). The combination is described as TechnologicalPedagogicalContentKnowledge(TPACK).
Content knowledge
Content knowledge is teachers
knowledge about the subject matter to be learnt of taught.Knowledge of content
is of critical importance for teachers. As Shulman (1986) noted ,this knowledge
would include knowledge of concepts, theories, ideas, organizational
frameworks, knowledge of evidence and proof, aswell as established practices
and approaches toward developing such knowledge. The cost of not having a
comprehensive base of content knowledge can be prohibit, for example, students
can receive incorrect information and development misconceptions about the
content area.
Pedagogical
knowledge
Pedagogical knowledge is teachers
deep knowledge about the processes and practices or methods of teaching and
learning. They encompass, among other things, overall educational purposes,
values and aims.
Pedagogical
content knowledge
PCK is the notion of the
transformation of the subject matter for teaching. This transformationoccurs as
the teacher interprets the subject matter, find multiple ways to represent it,
and adapts and tailors the instructional materials to alternative conceptions
and students’ prior knowledge.
Technology
knowledge
Technology knowledge is always in a
state of flux- more so than the other two core knowledge domains in the TPACK framework.
The definition of TK used in the TPACK Framework is close to that of fluency of
Information Technology.
Technological
pedagogical knowledge.
TPK Is an understanding of how
teaching and learning can change when particular technologies are used in particular
ways. To build TPK, a deeper understanding of the constraints and affordances
of technologies and the disciplinary contexts within which they function is
needed
Technological
content knowledge
Knowledge of how to use Technology
within a specific content area. Teachers need to understand which specific
technologies are best suited for addressing subject-matter learning in their
domains and how the content dictates or perhaps even changes the technology -or
vice versa.
·
Technological pedagogical content
knowledge(TPACK) is the knowledge base teachers need to effectively teach with
the use of technology in various subjects and practicing teaching methods.
·
TPACK makes the learning of the subject
for the student easier with appropriate pedagogy and Technology.
·
TPACK is aimed to help teachers in
creative thinking.
·
With the practice of TPACK, the process
of curriculum sample will reflect teachers' experiences to be more professional
and bringing a new dimension to technology for educational purposes.
·
The framework of TPACK model requires
that teachers should develop a detailed complex, fluent and flexible knowledge
of all the components, and teachers should find the appropriate technology and
should know how and why to use this technology in the teaching process.
·
Teachers' beliefs and experiences are
also effective in the environment of Information and Communication technologies
in education.
·
Teachers should improve themselves in
order to harmonize the existing technology with pedagogical and professional
competence, to easily overcome the possible problems, to find appropriate
solutions and develop new plans.
·
Teachers' perception of information
technologies and their views on, and practice in the use of these technologies
are important in terms of determining the present progress in technology
enhanced learning.
Tuesday, August 22, 2017
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)